Medical Review Policy

Scope of medical review

Medically sensitive content may be reviewed for clarity, factual accuracy, appropriate limitations, and consistency with general clinical practice. Review may focus on safety language, contraindications, administration concepts, side effects, and the distinction between proposed benefits and established outcomes.

Review status

A page is described as medically reviewed only when a qualified reviewer has evaluated that specific version. Pages that have not completed such a review will not be presented as medically reviewed.

Editorial review, fact-checking, and medical review are separate steps. Not every site page requires the same level of clinical review.

Reviewer independence

A medical reviewer evaluates health information rather than affiliate performance. Providers and affiliate relationships do not control a reviewer’s clinical judgment.

Limits of review

Medical review cannot account for an individual visitor’s history, medications, allergies, symptoms, laboratory results, or risk factors. It does not establish a clinician-patient relationship and cannot determine whether NAD injections are appropriate for a particular person.

Updates after review

Material revisions to medically reviewed content may require another review before the reviewed designation is applied to the updated version. Minor formatting, grammar, navigation, or disclosure changes do not necessarily require a new clinical review.

Questions and corrections

Questions about medical-review status or potential factual errors may be submitted through our Contact page. Personal medical questions should be directed to a qualified healthcare professional.